QUESTION 8
Answer the following :
(a)You are given a thread and a metre scale. How will you estimate the diameter of the thread?
(b)A screw gauge has a pitch of 1.0 mm and 200 divisions on the circular scale. Do you think it is possible to increase the accuracy of the screw gauge arbitrarily by increasing the number of divisions on the circular scale ?
(c) The mean diameter of a thin brass rod is to be measured by vernier callipers. Why is a set of 100 measurements of the diameter expected to yield a more reliable estimate than a set of 5 measurements only ?
SOLUTION
We need to estimate the diameter of a thin thread using a metre scale by measuring a wound coil.
Concept: Averaging method
The averaging method is used to measure dimensions smaller than the least count of the instrument. By winding the thread into a coil of turns, the total length becomes large enough to measure accurately.
Given:
- Instrument: Metre scale (least count = ).
- Material: A long thread.
Solving:
- Wind the thread tightly around the metre scale (or a cylindrical rod) such that the turns are adjacent to each other with no gaps.
- Count the total number of turns, denoted as .
- Measure the total width of the coil, , using the metre scale.
- Calculate the diameter of the thread by dividing the total length by the number of turns:
Answer
We need to determine if increasing the number of circular scale divisions can indefinitely improve a screw gauge's accuracy.
Concept: Least count
The least count () of a screw gauge is the smallest distance it can measure, defined by the ratio of pitch to the number of divisions .
Given:
Solving:
- Calculate the current least count:
- Mathematically, increasing decreases , which suggests higher precision.
- However, practical limits exist. If is too large, the divisions become so close that the human eye cannot distinguish them (resolving power limit).
- Mechanical imperfections, such as backlash error and non-uniformity of the screw thread, eventually exceed the theoretical .
Answer
We need to explain why taking 100 measurements of a rod's diameter is superior to taking just a few.
Concept: Random errors
Measurements are subject to random errors, which fluctuate unpredictably. According to the law of errors, the uncertainty in the mean of measurements is inversely proportional to the square root of .
Given:
- Number of measurements () = .
Solving:
- Every individual measurement contains a random error component.
- By taking the arithmetic mean of measurements, the random fluctuations tend to cancel each other out.
- If the error in a single measurement is , the error in the average of 100 measurements is:
- Thus, 100 measurements reduce the random error by a factor of compared to a single measurement, providing a much more reliable and precise value.